This question is basically five questions duct-taped together.
Start by clarifying requirements and scale (e.g., number of users, tenants, QPS, latency SLOs) before diving into components. Then present a high-level architecture covering authentication, authorization, token management, multi-tenancy, audit logging, and HA/scalability, and finally discuss trade-offs and failure modes.
Pro tip: Emphasize how you would evolve the system from MVP to production scale, showing awareness of operational concerns like key rotation, token revocation, and tenant isolation. Mention concrete technologies (e.g., OAuth 2.0, OIDC, JWT, RBAC/ABAC, Kafka for audit) but focus on principles over product names.
Ask about scale (users, tenants, QPS), latency SLOs, compliance needs (e.g., GDPR, PCI), and existing infrastructure. This shows you prioritize understanding before designing.
Outline core components: authentication service (OIDC/OAuth), authorization service (policy engine), token service (issuance/validation), tenant management, audit logging pipeline, and data stores. Explain how they interact.
Detail authentication flows (e.g., password, MFA, SSO), authorization models (RBAC/ABAC), multi-tenancy isolation (data and policy), token lifecycle (issuance, refresh, revocation), and audit logging (what, where, retention).
Discuss horizontal scaling of stateless services, caching strategies (e.g., for token validation), database sharding/partitioning by tenant, and HA via replication, multi-AZ deployment, and graceful degradation.
Highlight trade-offs (e.g., centralized vs. decentralized authorization, token revocation vs. statelessness) and failure scenarios (e.g., token service outage, audit log backpressure) with mitigations.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.