I went straight to greedy and immediately realized that was wrong because flipping a single zero can affect two potential bonuses depending on its neighbors.
First, clarify the problem: we need to choose up to k rest days to flip to workdays to maximize total pay = (number of workdays)*base + (number of adjacent workday pairs)*bonus. Then, recognize that flipping a rest day can create new adjacent pairs with existing workdays and with other flipped days, so we need to consider the marginal gain of each flip. A greedy approach using a max-heap of potential gains, or dynamic programming, can solve this efficiently; then analyze the time and space complexity.
Pro tip: Mention that the greedy approach works because the marginal gain of flipping a day is non-increasing as more flips are made, but be prepared to justify or switch to DP if the interviewer challenges it. Also, always clarify edge cases like k=0, all zeros, or all ones.
Restate the problem in your own words: given a binary string, base pay per workday, bonus for each adjacent pair of workdays, and up to k flips of '0' to '1', maximize total pay. Define the objective function clearly.
Explain that flipping a '0' to '1' increases the workday count by 1 (adding base pay) and may create new adjacent workday pairs with neighboring '1's, each adding bonus. Also, flipping consecutive zeros can create additional pairs among the flipped days.
Propose a greedy approach using a priority queue to always flip the rest day that yields the highest immediate gain, or a dynamic programming approach that considers the state of the previous day and the number of flips used. Discuss trade-offs.
For greedy with heap: O(n log n) time and O(n) space. For DP: O(n*k) time and O(k) space (or O(n*k) if naive). Mention that DP can be optimized to O(n) space by keeping only the previous row.
Walk through a small example, such as '1001' with k=1, to demonstrate the algorithm. Discuss edge cases: k=0, k >= number of zeros, all zeros, all ones, and large n.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.