I started with the usual stuff, data models, API endpoints, storage, but they kept steering me back to conflict handling specifically.
Start by clarifying requirements (scale, conflict types, time zones, recurrence) and then design a data model that supports efficient conflict detection. Propose an interval-based approach with indexing and discuss trade-offs between consistency and availability, including how to handle concurrent updates.
Pro tip: Mention that conflict detection should be done at write time with optimistic concurrency control, and that recurrence rules (RRULE) add complexity—consider expanding instances or using a rule engine. Also, discuss how to handle time zones and DST to show attention to real-world details.
Ask about scale (users, events per user), conflict types (hard vs soft), recurrence, time zones, and consistency needs. This ensures the design meets actual needs.
Design a schema for events with start/end times, user ID, and recurrence rules. Propose indexing on (user_id, start_time, end_time) to enable efficient range queries.
For a new event, query overlapping events using the index. Check for conflicts by comparing intervals, considering recurrence expansion and time zone normalization.
Handle concurrent writes with optimistic locking or transactions. Discuss trade-offs between strong consistency (e.g., using a database with serializable isolation) and availability.
Address scaling by sharding on user ID, caching, and asynchronous conflict checks. Discuss trade-offs like latency vs consistency and how to handle large recurring events.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.