← read.ai Interview Insights

read.ai·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

Intermediate
Jul 2026

Summary

Read.Ai coding screen, one question the whole time: build a rate limiter. Felt straightforward at first but the rolling window detail tripped me up more than I expected.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Design and implement a rate limiter class that supports per-user request limits using a rolling time window. The class should expose a constructor taking a max request count and window size in seconds, and an allow method that takes a user ID and timestamp and returns whether the request should be permitted.

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem DesignAPI & Integrations
Author's notes

My first instinct was a fixed window and I almost went with it before catching myself.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying requirements and edge cases, then propose a data structure that efficiently tracks per-user request timestamps within the rolling window. Implement the allow method using a queue or deque per user, and analyze time and space complexity.

Pro tip: Use a deque (double-ended queue) per user to store timestamps, allowing O(1) amortized operations for adding new requests and removing expired ones. This is more efficient than scanning a list or using a heap.

1. Clarify Requirements and Edge Cases

Ask about concurrency, memory constraints, and whether timestamps are monotonically increasing. Confirm that the window is rolling (sliding) and that limits are per-user.

2. Choose Data Structures

Select a hash map to store per-user deques of timestamps. Each deque holds timestamps of allowed requests within the current window.

3. Implement allow Method

For a given user and timestamp, remove timestamps from the front of the deque that are older than timestamp - windowSize. If the deque size is less than maxRequests, add the timestamp and return true; else return false.

4. Analyze Complexity and Optimize

Explain that each request is added and removed at most once, giving O(1) amortized time per operation. Space is O(number of users * maxRequests) in the worst case.

5. Discuss Extensions and Trade-offs

Mention potential improvements like using a token bucket for smoother limiting, handling distributed systems with Redis, or using a circular buffer for fixed memory.

Key Points to Mention

  • Rolling window vs fixed window and why rolling is more accurate
  • Using a deque per user for O(1) amortized operations
  • Handling out-of-order timestamps (if not monotonic, may need a different approach)
  • Memory management: cleaning up inactive users to avoid leaks
  • Concurrency considerations: thread safety with locks or concurrent data structures
  • Time and space complexity analysis

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.