My first instinct was just sorting each window, which is obviously too slow and I knew it while saying it out loud.
Clarify the problem constraints and edge cases, then propose an efficient solution using a sliding window with a data structure that supports fast insertion, deletion, and order statistics (e.g., two heaps or a balanced BST). Explain how to maintain the sum of the smallest w-k elements dynamically as the window slides, and analyze the time and space complexity.
Pro tip: Discuss the trade-offs between different data structures (e.g., two heaps vs. balanced BST vs. Fenwick tree) and mention that in an interview, you might start with a simpler approach and then optimize, showing your thought process.
Ask clarifying questions about input size, whether k is fixed, if the array can contain duplicates, and what to return if w-k <= 0. Confirm that the window slides one step at a time.
Choose a data structure that maintains the window elements and can efficiently remove the k largest and compute the sum of the rest. Consider two heaps (min-heap for smallest w-k, max-heap for largest k) or a balanced BST with subtree sums.
When the window slides, remove the outgoing element and add the incoming element. Update the data structure to maintain the partition of smallest w-k and largest k, adjusting the sum accordingly.
For each window position, after updating the data structure, compute the average of the smallest w-k elements by dividing the maintained sum by (w-k). Handle division by zero if w-k = 0.
State the time complexity per window step (e.g., O(log w) with heaps) and overall O(n log w). Discuss edge cases like k >= w, empty array, and large inputs.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.