My first instinct was brute force all combinations of four points and check each one, which works but is slow and I knew they'd push back on it.
Clarify the problem constraints (input size, coordinate ranges, output format) and propose an efficient algorithm. A common approach is to group points by x-coordinate, then for each pair of x-coordinates, find matching y-coordinates that form rectangles. Alternatively, use a hash set of points and iterate over pairs of points as potential diagonals, checking if the other two corners exist.
Pro tip: Mention that rectangles can be identified by their diagonals: for any two points that can serve as opposite corners, the other two corners are determined. This reduces the problem to checking pairs of points and using a hash set for O(1) lookups, yielding O(n^2) time complexity.
Ask about input size, coordinate ranges, whether points are unique, and the exact output format (e.g., sorted by x and y, one per line). Confirm if rectangles can be axis-aligned only or any orientation.
Decide between approaches: (a) group by x and y coordinates, (b) use diagonal property with hash set. Explain the time and space complexity of each and justify your choice.
Describe how to iterate over pairs of points, compute the other two corners, and check for their existence. Emphasize avoiding duplicate rectangles by enforcing an ordering (e.g., only consider pairs where x1 < x2 and y1 < y2).
Explain how to collect valid rectangles, sort them by x and y coordinates (e.g., sort the four points within each rectangle, then sort the list of rectangles), and output one per line.
State time and space complexity (e.g., O(n^2) time, O(n) space). Discuss edge cases: no rectangles, duplicate points, collinear points, and large inputs.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.