This was basically the whole interview compressed into one prompt.
Structure your answer as a clear, end-to-end pipeline: data loading and preprocessing, tokenization, model fine-tuning with HuggingFace Trainer, evaluation using multiple metrics, and deployment considerations. Emphasize trade-offs and production readiness, especially for a content moderation system at Meta's scale. Show awareness of class imbalance, threshold tuning, and latency constraints.
Pro tip: Don't just list steps—highlight the business context: for harmful content detection, false negatives are often costlier than false positives, so discuss how you'd adjust the decision threshold and monitor for drift. Mention that you'd start with a small model like DistilBERT for fast iteration, then scale to BERT or larger if needed.
Load a labeled dataset (e.g., Jigsaw toxic comments) using HuggingFace Datasets, inspect class distribution, and handle imbalance via weighting or resampling. Split into train/validation/test sets, ensuring no leakage.
Use AutoTokenizer to tokenize text with padding/truncation to a fixed max length. Load a pretrained model like DistilBERT with AutoModelForSequenceClassification, setting num_labels=2.
Define TrainingArguments (learning rate, batch size, epochs, evaluation strategy) and compute_metrics for accuracy, precision, recall, F1. Use Trainer to train and evaluate, leveraging early stopping and mixed precision for efficiency.
Analyze metrics on validation set, plot precision-recall curve, and choose an optimal threshold based on business costs. Report final metrics on held-out test set.
Export model to ONNX or TorchScript for optimized inference, deploy via a REST API (e.g., FastAPI) with batching and caching. Set up monitoring for data drift, latency, and false positive/negative rates.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.