← JP Morgan Chase Interview Insights
I went straight for sorting the array first, which is the right move, but I fumbled explaining why for a second.
Start by clarifying the problem and edge cases, then propose sorting the array to bring close values together. After sorting, a single pass can compute adjacent differences and collect all pairs achieving the minimum difference.
Pro tip: Mention that sorting is O(n log n) and is optimal for comparison-based approaches; if the interviewer asks for better, note that O(n) is possible with hashing when the value range is small, but sorting is generally preferred for its simplicity and robustness.
Restate the problem to ensure understanding: distinct integers, find all pairs with minimum absolute difference. Ask about input size, value range, and whether the output order matters.
Sort the array in ascending order. This ensures that the minimum absolute difference will be between adjacent elements, reducing the problem to checking consecutive pairs.
Initialize min_diff to infinity and an empty result list. Iterate through adjacent pairs, compute the difference, and update min_diff and result accordingly: if diff < min_diff, reset result; if diff == min_diff, append the pair.
After the pass, return the list of pairs. Discuss time and space complexity: O(n log n) time due to sorting, O(n) space for the result in the worst case.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.