My approach was to find contiguous clumps of 1s and figure out whether the leftmost 1 in a clump should swap with the 0 to its left.
Recognize that each '1' can either stay or move left by one, so the problem reduces to selecting a subset of 1s to shift left such that no two 1s end up at the same index. Use dynamic programming with states representing the previous position's occupancy, or model as maximum weight matching on a path graph. Then compute the maximum sum of populations at the final protected indices.
Pro tip: Clarify with the interviewer whether multiple 1s can shift to the same index (they cannot, since each index can hold at most one protected unit). Also, consider edge cases like all 1s, no 1s, and 1s at boundaries.
Each '1' can either stay at its original index or move left by one. No two '1's can occupy the same index. The goal is to maximize the sum of populations at the final positions of the 1s.
For each '1', decide whether to shift left or stay, ensuring no conflicts. This can be seen as selecting a set of indices to protect, where each selected index must be either an original '1' or the left neighbor of an original '1', and each original '1' can be used at most once.
Process indices from left to right. Maintain DP states: dp[i][0] = max protected population up to index i when index i is not protected, dp[i][1] = max when index i is protected. Transition based on whether the current index can be protected by a 1 from i or i+1.
Write code for the DP, handle base cases, and test with examples including edge cases (all 1s, no 1s, 1s at start/end). Verify time complexity O(n) and space O(1) if optimized.
Mention that this can also be solved via greedy or maximum matching on a path, but DP is straightforward. Be prepared to explain why greedy might fail (e.g., local optimal choices may not lead to global optimum).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.