← Anthropic Interview Insights
Start by clarifying requirements (scale, file sizes, exact vs. near-duplicate, storage constraints) and then propose a two-phase approach: first, use a fast hash (e.g., MD5/SHA-1) to group potential duplicates, then confirm with a cryptographic hash (e.g., SHA-256) or byte-by-byte comparison. Discuss trade-offs between time, space, and accuracy, and outline a scalable architecture using chunking, distributed storage, and indexing.
Pro tip: Emphasize the importance of chunk-level deduplication for large files and explain how content-defined chunking (e.g., Rabin fingerprinting) avoids the boundary-shift problem, showing depth beyond basic hashing.
Ask about scale (number of files, total size), file types, acceptable false positive/negative rates, latency requirements, and whether near-duplicate detection is needed. This shapes the entire design.
Propose a multi-stage approach: quick hash (e.g., MD5) to bucket candidates, then strong hash (e.g., SHA-256) for exact duplicates. For large files, use chunking (fixed or content-defined) and hash each chunk to enable partial deduplication.
Outline a distributed system: use a metadata store (e.g., key-value store) mapping hashes to file locations, and a blob store for unique chunks. Discuss sharding, replication, and consistency trade-offs (e.g., eventual vs. strong).
Discuss time/space trade-offs: hashing cost vs. storage savings, memory vs. disk-based indexes, and parallelization. Mention techniques like bloom filters to reduce disk lookups.
Cover handling of hash collisions (verify with byte comparison), small files, empty files, and concurrency. Optionally, discuss near-duplicate detection using locality-sensitive hashing (LSH) or similarity metrics.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.