My first instinct was to just guess randomly and prune, which is technically fine but completely misses the point.
Start by clarifying the problem constraints and API behavior, then propose a strategy that partitions the candidate list based on feedback. Use an information-theoretic approach to minimize worst-case guesses, and discuss trade-offs between greedy heuristics and optimal decision trees.
Pro tip: Mention that you can precompute the feedback for all pairs of candidate words to build a decision tree offline, which is a common technique in Mastermind-like games and demonstrates strong algorithmic thinking.
Ask about the size of the candidate list, whether the secret is guaranteed to be in the list, and if the API returns only the count of exact matches or also partial matches. Confirm that guesses must be from the candidate list.
Represent each candidate word as a possible secret. Each guess partitions the remaining candidates into groups based on the feedback (number of exact matches). The goal is to reduce the candidate set to one within 10 guesses.
Consider a greedy approach: at each step, pick the guess that minimizes the size of the largest resulting partition (minimax). Alternatively, use an information-theoretic measure like entropy to maximize expected information gain.
Calculate the maximum number of guesses needed with the chosen strategy. For 6-letter words, the feedback ranges from 0 to 6, giving 7 possible outcomes. With 10 guesses, we can distinguish up to 7^10 possibilities, which is huge, so 10 is likely sufficient.
Mention precomputing the feedback matrix for all pairs of words to speed up the decision tree construction. Discuss the trade-off between optimal worst-case (minimax) and average-case (entropy) strategies, and note that precomputation may be feasible if the candidate list is small.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.