I went straight to a relational schema with indexed columns for the numeric fields, which felt right.
Start by clarifying requirements: data volume, query patterns, and consistency needs. Then propose a data model and storage solution that supports efficient querying and sorting, followed by an API design and scalability considerations.
Pro tip: Mention that planetary data is relatively static and read-heavy, so caching and denormalization can be leveraged, but also discuss how to handle updates (e.g., new discoveries) without downtime.
Ask about data volume, query patterns (e.g., sort by size, distance), latency requirements, and consistency needs. Determine if data is static or dynamic.
Define a schema with attributes like name, size, distance, and other relevant fields. Consider using a relational database for structured queries or a NoSQL store for flexibility.
Select a database that supports efficient sorting and filtering (e.g., PostgreSQL with B-tree indexes, or Elasticsearch for full-text and sorting). Plan indexes on sortable fields.
Define RESTful endpoints (e.g., GET /planets?sort=size&order=desc) with pagination. Consider GraphQL for flexible queries. Ensure API supports filtering and sorting parameters.
Since data is read-heavy, implement caching (e.g., Redis) and possibly a CDN. Discuss sharding or replication if data grows, and how to handle updates.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.