← Apple Interview Insights

Apple·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
Jun 2026

Summary

Apple SWE interview with a graph/routing problem that looks deceptively like a simple BFS until you actually try to implement it. The complexity discussion at the end was where things got interesting.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

You're given a set of bus route timetables with travel times between stops and wait times at each stop. Given a starting location, destination, and departure time, find the earliest possible arrival time at the destination. Transfers between routes are allowed. Also discuss time complexity and edge cases like no available path, multiple routes with equal travel time, and departure times that may or may not align with scheduled buses.

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem DesignTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This one took me a minute to even model correctly.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Model the problem as a time-dependent graph where each stop is a node and edges represent bus rides with travel times, but waiting times depend on schedules. Use a modified Dijkstra's algorithm that tracks earliest arrival times, considering both travel and waiting times at each stop. Discuss complexity and edge cases to show thoroughness.

Pro tip: Emphasize that the key challenge is handling time-dependent edge weights (waiting for next bus) and that a naive Dijkstra with static weights fails; instead, compute the next available departure dynamically.

1. Clarify the problem and assumptions

Ask clarifying questions about input format, whether buses run on fixed schedules, if transfers are allowed only at certain stops, and if wait times are fixed or schedule-dependent. Confirm that we need the earliest arrival time, not the shortest travel time.

2. Model as a time-dependent graph

Represent each stop as a node and each bus route segment as a directed edge with a travel time. The waiting time at a stop depends on the bus schedule, so edge weights are time-dependent. Consider using a priority queue to always expand the earliest arrival time.

3. Design the algorithm

Use a modified Dijkstra's algorithm where the distance label for each node is the earliest arrival time. When relaxing an edge, compute the next departure time from the current stop based on the schedule, then add travel time. Update if the new arrival time is earlier.

4. Analyze time complexity

The algorithm runs in O((V + E) log V) if we can compute the next departure in O(1) or O(log S) time (e.g., via binary search on schedule). Discuss how the number of routes and stops affects complexity.

5. Discuss edge cases and trade-offs

Cover cases like no path (return infinity or error), multiple routes with equal travel time (any is fine, but earliest arrival matters), departure times not aligning with schedules (wait until next bus), and potential for cycles. Mention that if schedules are periodic, we can preprocess to speed up queries.

Key Points to Mention

  • Time-dependent graph modeling and why static Dijkstra fails
  • Modified Dijkstra with priority queue and dynamic edge weights
  • Handling waiting times by finding the next available bus departure
  • Time complexity analysis: O((V+E) log V) with efficient next-departure lookup
  • Edge cases: no path, equal travel times, schedule misalignment, and transfers
  • Potential optimizations: precomputing schedules, using binary search for next departure

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.