The cross-company framing threw me off more than it should have.
Start by clarifying the objective: maximize net revenue (after driver payments) over 12 months, not just gross bookings. Then segment drivers by tenure/performance and design a dynamic payment structure that balances incentives for high-value drivers with cost control, using data to model trade-offs.
Pro tip: Acknowledge the two-sided marketplace: changes to driver pay affect rider experience and long-term supply. Show you'd run a controlled experiment before full rollout to avoid unintended consequences.
Confirm that 'net revenue' means Lyft's revenue after driver payments, and that the 12-month horizon implies balancing short-term cost savings with long-term driver retention. Ask about any regulatory or competitive constraints.
Break drivers into segments (e.g., full-time vs. part-time, high-rated vs. low-rated, tenure) and analyze how the current payment structure impacts each segment's behavior and Lyft's net revenue.
Propose levers such as base pay adjustments, surge multipliers, performance bonuses, and long-term incentives (e.g., tenure-based rewards). Tailor these to each segment to optimize net revenue without harming supply.
Use historical data and simulations to estimate the impact of each lever on driver supply, rider demand, and net revenue. Prioritize changes with the highest expected ROI and lowest risk.
Run A/B tests in select markets, measure effects on net revenue, driver retention, and rider satisfaction, then scale successful changes and refine based on feedback.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.