← Microsoft Interview Insights
I got the basic structure down pretty quick: filter first, then project.
Start by clarifying requirements and edge cases, then outline a simple, efficient algorithm that iterates over rows, applies all filters, and projects the selected columns. Discuss trade-offs between readability and performance, and mention potential optimizations like indexing or vectorization.
Pro tip: Emphasize that you would validate inputs and handle missing columns gracefully, and suggest that for large datasets, pushing filters down or using columnar storage can drastically improve performance.
Ask about data types, missing columns, empty filters, and performance expectations. Confirm whether filters are combined with AND and if projection order matters.
Outline a straightforward approach: iterate through each row, check all filter conditions, and if all pass, build a new dictionary with only the projected columns. Discuss time complexity O(n*m) where n is rows and m is filters.
Write a function that takes rows, columns, and filters. Use a helper to evaluate each filter, and handle operators via a dispatch dictionary or if-elif chain. Ensure missing columns raise appropriate errors.
Walk through test cases: no filters, multiple filters, empty result, missing columns, and different data types. Verify that projection returns only requested columns in the correct order.
Mention that for large datasets, you could build indexes on filter columns, use vectorized operations (e.g., pandas), or push filters down to a database. Balance simplicity with performance based on context.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.