The wildcard part is where I started to feel the pressure.
Start by clarifying requirements and edge cases, then outline a recursive DFS solution that processes path segments one by one, handling wildcards, array indices, and missing keys. Discuss trade-offs between recursion and iterative approaches, and when to short-circuit for efficiency.
Pro tip: Emphasize that wildcards can lead to exponential blow-up, so you should discuss pruning and memoization if the same subproblems repeat. Also, mention that returning all matches requires collecting results, but you can short-circuit if the caller only needs the first match.
Ask about input types, path syntax, wildcard behavior, and expected output format. Confirm handling of consecutive wildcards, missing keys, non-object intermediates, and empty results.
Process path segments recursively: at each step, if segment is '*', iterate over all keys/indices; if literal, check existence. Handle arrays by treating indices as keys.
For consecutive wildcards, ensure they apply sequentially (e.g., 'a.*.*.b' matches two levels). For missing keys or non-object intermediates, return empty list. For empty results, return empty list.
Recursion is simpler but may hit stack limits; iterative with explicit stack avoids that but is more complex. Choose based on depth and environment.
If only first match needed, stop early. For all matches, must traverse fully. Mention pruning when a branch cannot yield results.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.