My first instinct was to just return the coordinate-wise mean and call it done, which is technically correct for L2 with k=1.
First, clarify that for k=1, the optimal centroid is the mean of all points, which minimizes the sum of squared Euclidean distances. Then, implement the iterative K-means update: initialize the centroid (e.g., randomly or as the mean), assign all points to the single cluster, and recompute the centroid as the mean of assigned points until convergence. Finally, compare the iterative result with the closed-form mean to verify correctness.
Pro tip: Emphasize that the iterative approach, while unnecessary for k=1, demonstrates the general K-means algorithm and highlights the convergence property. Mention that in practice, for k=1, the closed-form solution is always preferred for efficiency.
Confirm that k=1 means all points belong to a single cluster, and the goal is to find the centroid that minimizes the sum of squared Euclidean distances. State that the closed-form solution is the arithmetic mean.
Compute the centroid as the element-wise mean of all points across each dimension. This provides a baseline for verification.
Initialize the centroid (e.g., randomly or as the mean). Then repeatedly assign all points to the single cluster and update the centroid to the mean of assigned points until the centroid change is below a tolerance or a maximum number of iterations is reached.
Check that the iterative centroid converges to the closed-form mean. Discuss why convergence is guaranteed for k=1 and note any numerical precision considerations.
Compare the time complexity: closed-form is O(n*d) while iterative is O(t*n*d) where t is the number of iterations. Highlight that for k=1, the closed-form is always preferred, but the iterative approach illustrates the general algorithm.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.