← Two Sigma Interview Insights
This is basically four questions stitched together and they just kept going.
Start by clarifying the data structure and definitions: volatility as standard deviation of temperature, similarity as correlation or Euclidean distance to NYC. Then outline a modular pipeline: compute volatility, compute similarity, build a regression model using town temperatures to predict NYC, and finally implement greedy forward selection to choose the best subset of towns based on MSE.
Pro tip: Emphasize that greedy forward selection is a heuristic and discuss the trade-off between computational cost and optimality; also mention the importance of cross-validation to avoid overfitting when evaluating MSE.
Ask about data format (time series, aligned dates), define volatility (e.g., standard deviation of daily temperatures), and similarity (e.g., correlation or Euclidean distance). Confirm that MSE is the evaluation metric for prediction.
For each town, calculate volatility as the standard deviation of its temperature series. For similarity to NYC, compute correlation or distance between each town's series and NYC's series, then rank towns.
Use a regression model (e.g., linear regression) where NYC temperature is the target and town temperatures are features. Train on historical data and evaluate using MSE on a validation set.
Start with an empty set of towns. Iteratively add the town that most reduces validation MSE until reaching the specified count. Use cross-validation to estimate MSE reliably.
Compare the selected subset's performance to using all towns or other subsets. Discuss computational complexity (O(k*n) for k features and n candidates) and potential overfitting.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.