I started with the basics, single node, in-memory, then the interviewer kept pushing on durability and consistency.
Start by clarifying requirements: scale, consistency, latency, durability, and access patterns. Then propose a high-level design (e.g., distributed hash table with replication) and dive into key components like partitioning, replication, and consistency models. Discuss trade-offs and justify choices based on requirements.
Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness of real-world systems like DynamoDB and Bigtable, and explicitly state assumptions about scale and consistency to guide your design decisions. Show how you would handle failures and ensure availability.
Ask questions to understand the expected scale (data size, QPS), consistency needs (strong vs eventual), latency requirements, durability, and access patterns (read/write ratio).
Sketch the overall architecture: clients, API, partitioning, replication, and storage engine. Choose a data model (e.g., key-value pairs) and decide on a partitioning strategy (e.g., consistent hashing).
Detail critical components: how data is partitioned and replicated, consistency mechanisms (e.g., quorum, vector clocks), failure handling (hinted handoff, anti-entropy), and storage engine (LSM trees vs B-trees).
Explain trade-offs between consistency and availability (CAP theorem), latency and durability, and different design choices (e.g., master-slave vs peer-to-peer replication).
Describe how the system scales horizontally, handles node failures, and ensures data durability and availability. Mention monitoring and operational considerations.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.