← Applied intuition Interview Insights
The setup sounds manageable until you realize get_size has to handle three different kinds of inputs and you need to figure out which one you're dealing with at query time.
Start by clarifying the message definition format and the exact operations required, then design a two-pass parser that first builds a symbol table of user-defined types and then resolves field sizes and types. Use a recursive resolution strategy with memoization to handle nested user-defined types and detect cycles.
Pro tip: Explicitly discuss error handling for undefined types, duplicate definitions, and cyclic dependencies—this shows production-level thinking and often impresses interviewers more than the happy path.
Ask about the exact syntax of the message definition string (e.g., 'fieldName: type', indentation for nesting) and confirm the expected behavior for edge cases like unknown fields or types.
Plan to store parsed definitions in a map from type name to its fields, and a map from field name to its type within each message. Consider using a trie or nested maps for efficient lookup.
Implement a parser that reads line by line, extracts field names and types, and builds the symbol table. Handle indentation or delimiters to capture nested message definitions.
For size queries, recursively compute the size of user-defined types by summing field sizes, using memoization to avoid recomputation and detect cycles. For type queries, simply look up the field's type in the symbol table.
Add checks for undefined types, duplicate field names, and cyclic dependencies. Return appropriate errors or exceptions as needed.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.