This is a beast of a question and I underestimated how much they wanted me to actually commit to tradeoffs rather than just list options.
Start by clarifying requirements (scale, consistency, latency) and then present a high-level design covering data model, partitioning, replication, and failure handling. Dive into trade-offs for each component, and conclude by addressing hot keys, persistence, and scaling under read/write pressure.
Pro tip: Explicitly state your assumptions about scale and consistency requirements upfront; this shows you can drive a design conversation and avoid solving the wrong problem.
Ask about expected scale (data size, QPS), consistency needs (strong vs eventual), latency targets, and failure tolerance. This shapes all subsequent design decisions.
Propose a simple key-value interface (get, put, delete) and discuss optional features like versioning or TTL. Mention that keys are opaque strings and values are blobs.
Explain partitioning via consistent hashing (or range-based) and replication factor N with a coordinator-based or leaderless approach. Discuss consistency models (e.g., quorum-based) and trade-offs.
Describe failure detection (heartbeats, gossip), recovery (hinted handoff, read repair), and mitigation for hot keys (key splitting, caching, load balancing).
Discuss storage engines (LSM trees vs B-trees), write-ahead logging, and scaling strategies (adding nodes, rebalancing, read replicas, caching layers).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.