The interviewer kept pushing back on my first instinct and asked me to justify why I picked what I picked.
Start by clarifying the requirements: sparse vs. dense data, expected operations, and memory constraints. Then propose a hash map (dictionary) keyed by cell coordinates, explaining why it's efficient for sparse data and simple to implement. Finally, discuss trade-offs with alternatives like 2D arrays and when each might be appropriate.
Pro tip: Mention that in a real spreadsheet, most cells are empty, so a sparse representation like a hash map is often preferred. Also, consider using a composite key (e.g., tuple or string) and discuss potential memory overhead.
Ask about expected data density, typical operations, and memory constraints to determine if a sparse or dense structure is better.
Suggest a hash map (dictionary) with cell coordinates as keys and integer values as values, explaining its O(1) average time for get/set.
Compare with a 2D array (dense, O(1) access but memory-heavy for sparse data) and mention hybrid approaches if needed.
Cover key design (e.g., tuple vs. string), handling out-of-bounds, default values, and potential memory optimizations.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.