Started confident, wrote createAccount and deposit pretty quickly.
Start by clarifying requirements and defining the core data model (Account with ID and balance) and operations (create, deposit, transfer). Then outline a simple in-memory implementation using a hash map for O(1) account lookup, and discuss error handling for invalid accounts and insufficient funds. Finally, consider trade-offs like concurrency, persistence, and scalability to show depth.
Pro tip: Mention that you would use a lock or transactional mechanism to ensure atomicity in transfers, especially if the system might be accessed concurrently. This shows awareness of real-world banking systems and prevents race conditions.
Ask about expected scale, concurrency needs, persistence requirements, and whether operations need to be atomic. Confirm the exact operations and error conditions.
Define an Account class with unique ID and balance, and specify method signatures for createAccount, deposit, and transfer. Decide on return types and error handling (exceptions vs. result objects).
Use a hash map (e.g., HashMap in Java, dict in Python) to store accounts by ID for O(1) lookup. Implement deposit and transfer with checks for account existence and sufficient funds.
Discuss how to make transfers atomic and thread-safe, e.g., using locks, synchronized methods, or transactional memory. Mention potential deadlocks and how to avoid them (e.g., ordering locks).
Talk about limitations of in-memory storage (no persistence, limited by RAM) and possible extensions like persistence, distributed systems, and idempotency for transfers.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.