My first instinct was to just check if the path is in the set, which is obviously incomplete.
Clarify the input format and constraints, then propose an efficient solution using a trie or hash set with ancestor checking. Discuss trade-offs between preprocessing and query time, and handle edge cases like root and trailing slashes.
Pro tip: Mention that you can preprocess the accessible folders into a trie for O(1) lookup per path segment, but also consider a simpler hash set approach if the number of accessible folders is small. Always discuss time and space complexity.
Ask about the input format (e.g., list of strings, tree structure), expected query frequency, and whether paths are absolute. Confirm if access is inherited strictly by prefix (e.g., '/a' grants access to '/a/b').
Decide between a trie (prefix tree) for efficient prefix matching or a hash set of accessible folders with ancestor checks. Consider preprocessing time vs. query time trade-offs.
For a trie: insert all accessible folders, then traverse the query path; if any node is marked accessible, return true. For hash set: check if the query path or any of its ancestors is in the set.
Consider root path '/', trailing slashes, case sensitivity, and empty inputs. Ensure the algorithm correctly handles paths that are prefixes of each other.
State time and space complexity for both preprocessing and query. Discuss possible optimizations like caching frequent queries or using a sorted list with binary search.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.