I kept thinking there was some elegant solution hiding in there but there really isn't.
Clarify the exact rules for whitespace handling and suffix formatting, then design a greedy line-breaking algorithm that accounts for the suffix length. Walk through edge cases like long words, multiple spaces, and suffix rollover (e.g., #99 to #100) to ensure correctness.
Pro tip: Mention that the suffix length can change as the line number increases (e.g., from 2 to 3 digits), so the effective character limit per line must be recalculated dynamically. Also, discuss how to handle words longer than the limit—either truncate or allow overflow—and confirm with the interviewer.
Ask about whitespace handling (e.g., multiple spaces, leading/trailing), suffix format (fixed width? zero-padded?), and behavior for words exceeding the limit. Confirm whether the suffix counts toward the limit and if it's always appended.
Use a greedy approach: iterate through words, accumulate them into a line while the total length (including spaces and suffix) fits the limit. When adding a word would exceed, finalize the line with the suffix and start a new line.
Drop trailing spaces before the suffix and push them to the next line if needed. Recalculate the available content length per line based on the current line number's suffix length (e.g., 2 digits for lines 1-99, 3 for 100+).
Validate with cases: empty message, single long word, multiple spaces, line numbers crossing digit boundaries, and exact fit. Ensure no trailing space on the last line and correct suffix placement.
Discuss time complexity O(n) where n is message length, and space O(n) for output. Mention trade-offs: greedy vs. optimal line breaking (e.g., minimizing raggedness) and whether to precompute suffix lengths.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.