I had spent a solid chunk of prep time on a chat server design I'd seen floating around, so when this came up I had to context-switch pretty fast.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then propose a consensus-based design (e.g., Raft) with a clear leader election and membership change protocol. Walk through the core components—leader election, heartbeats, log replication, and failure detection—and explain how you would implement and test them locally using multiple processes or containers.
Pro tip: Emphasize that you would implement a simplified version first (e.g., using a well-known algorithm like Raft) and then discuss trade-offs and potential improvements, showing you can balance pragmatism with depth.
Ask about expected scale, consistency vs. availability trade-offs, and whether the system needs to handle network partitions. Confirm that the implementation is local (e.g., multiple processes on one machine) and discuss any language or tooling preferences.
Select a consensus algorithm like Raft or Paxos that handles leader election and membership changes. Explain why Raft is often preferred for its understandability and strong leader model.
Outline the key components: leader election (using randomized timeouts and RequestVote RPCs), heartbeats (AppendEntries RPCs), failure detection (timeouts), and membership changes (joint consensus or single-server changes). Describe how nodes discover the leader and how new nodes join.
Detail the failover process: followers detect leader failure via missed heartbeats, transition to candidate, and initiate election. Discuss how to avoid split votes (randomized timeouts) and ensure safety (majority quorum).
Describe how to implement locally: use multiple processes/threads with inter-process communication (e.g., sockets), simulate network partitions, and test scenarios like leader crash, network delays, and concurrent joins. Mention logging and metrics for observability.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.