This is one of those questions that sounds like a single question but is actually eight questions stacked on top of each other.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then design a high-level architecture that decouples request submission from processing using a durable queue and a scheduler. Dive into the worker lifecycle, GPU pool integration, and failure handling, emphasizing idempotency, retries, and SLAs. Conclude by discussing trade-offs and how the design meets the specific challenges of fluctuating GPU availability and worker termination.
Pro tip: Emphasize that idempotency and checkpointing are critical for long-running jobs on preemptible workers; design the system so that any worker can resume a job from the last checkpoint without duplicating work or corrupting state.
Ask questions to understand expected scale, latency SLAs, priority levels, cost constraints, and failure semantics. Confirm that workers are ephemeral and GPUs are heterogeneous and dynamically available.
Propose a decoupled system: API gateway for request submission, durable queue (e.g., Kafka/SQS) for buffering, scheduler for assigning jobs to workers, and a state store for job metadata and progress. Include a GPU pool manager that tracks available resources.
Design a scheduler that considers priority, cost, and GPU availability. Use a pull-based model where workers request jobs when ready, or a push-based model with leases. Ensure each worker processes one video at a time and handle worker termination via heartbeats and lease expiration.
Implement retries with exponential backoff, checkpointing for resume, and idempotent job execution using unique job IDs and deduplication. Use a state machine to track job status and ensure exactly-once semantics for critical steps.
Define SLAs for job completion and progress tracking. Discuss monitoring, alerting, and how to handle long-running jobs. Address trade-offs between cost, latency, and reliability, and how the design adapts to fluctuating GPU pools.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.