The core trick here isn't the logic, it's knowing your HTTP and JSON libraries well enough to not fumble around.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then outline a modular design that separates HTTP execution, response validation, and reporting. Emphasize robustness through error handling, retries, and idempotency, and discuss how you would test and scale the solution.
Pro tip: Mention idempotency keys and rate-limit handling early—Stripe cares deeply about safe retries and respecting API limits. Also, propose a dry-run mode to validate the JSON schema before making any calls.
Ask about the JSON schema, expected response matching (exact vs. partial), authentication, rate limits, and error handling expectations. Confirm whether requests should be made sequentially or can be parallelized.
Propose separate components: a parser/validator for the JSON input, an HTTP client with retry and timeout logic, a response comparator, and a reporter. This separation improves testability and maintainability.
Use a resilient HTTP client with configurable timeouts, exponential backoff for retries, and idempotency keys for non-idempotent methods. Handle rate limits (429) by respecting Retry-After headers.
Parse responses (JSON/XML) and compare against expected output using a deep equality check or a JSON schema validator. Support partial matching and ignore volatile fields like timestamps if needed.
Collect mismatches with details (request, expected, actual) and output a clear report. Log all interactions for debugging, and consider exit codes for CI integration.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.