The first part felt easy enough, just check if the email host equals the domain string.
Start by clarifying the requirements and defining the matching rules (exact, fuzzy, subdomain, alias). Then propose a modular solution that separates parsing, matching, and filtering, and discuss trade-offs like performance vs. accuracy. Finally, outline unit tests covering edge cases such as case sensitivity, subdomains, aliases, and invalid inputs.
Pro tip: Demonstrate production awareness by discussing how to handle large datasets efficiently (e.g., indexing domains) and how to make the matching logic configurable and testable, which is crucial for Stripe's scale and reliability.
Ask questions to understand what 'matches' means: exact domain, subdomains, aliases (e.g., gmail.com vs googlemail.com), fuzzy matching (typos), and case sensitivity. Identify edge cases like missing fields, multiple emails, or international domains.
Break the problem into components: a parser to extract domains from contact fields, a matcher that applies rules (exact, subdomain, alias, fuzzy), and a filter that applies the matcher to the list. This separation allows easy extension and testing.
Consider performance implications for large contact lists: precompute domain sets, use tries or hash maps for alias resolution, and decide on fuzzy matching thresholds. Balance accuracy with speed and complexity.
Propose test cases for each matching rule: exact match, subdomain (e.g., user@mail.example.com matches example.com), alias (e.g., user@gmail.com matches googlemail.com), fuzzy (e.g., example.co matches example.com), and edge cases like null values, empty strings, and multiple domains.
Recap the approach, emphasizing clarity, extensibility, and testability. Be open to feedback and suggest iterative improvements based on interviewer hints.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.