← Amazon Interview Insights

Amazon·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

Intermediate
Jul 2026

Summary

Amazon SWE interview with a scheduling/optimization problem that looked deceptively simple at first glance. The greedy logic took a while to click and I'm not totally sure I nailed the complexity analysis on the spot.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

You have N delivery centers and a list of orders, each with a destination city. Each center handles at most one order per day, but if the order's city doesn't match the center's ID it costs 2 days of capacity instead of 1. Orders can't be split across centers. Write an efficient function to find the minimum number of days to complete all orders, and analyze its time and space complexity.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

Took me a minute to even understand what 'two days of capacity' meant.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Model the problem as a bipartite matching or flow problem where centers are assigned to orders, minimizing the total capacity cost (1 if city matches center ID, else 2). Then, since each center can process one order per day, the minimum days is the maximum over centers of the total capacity cost assigned to that center. Use a greedy or flow-based algorithm to find the optimal assignment.

Pro tip: Start by clarifying the constraints and edge cases (e.g., N centers, M orders, city IDs). Then, discuss the trade-offs between a greedy approach and a more robust flow-based solution, and always analyze time and space complexity.

1. Understand the problem

Restate the problem: N centers, each can handle at most one order per day; cost is 1 day if order's city matches center ID, else 2 days. Orders cannot be split. Goal: minimize total days to complete all orders.

2. Identify the core challenge

The challenge is assigning orders to centers to minimize the maximum load (total cost) per center, since days = max load. This is a load balancing problem with assignment costs.

3. Propose an algorithm

Use a min-cost max-flow or bipartite matching approach: create a source connected to orders (capacity 1, cost 0), orders to centers (capacity 1, cost 1 or 2), centers to sink (capacity infinity, cost 0). Find min-cost flow of M units. The answer is the maximum flow through any center (or the min possible max load via binary search on days).

4. Analyze complexity

For flow: O(V^2 E) or O(E * flow) depending on algorithm. With N centers and M orders, V = N+M+2, E = O(NM). Space O(V+E). Alternatively, binary search on days D and check feasibility via max flow: O(log(max_days) * flow_complexity).

5. Discuss trade-offs and edge cases

Mention greedy heuristics (e.g., assign matching cities first) may not be optimal. Edge cases: more orders than centers, all orders match, none match. Also consider if N is large and M small, etc.

Key Points to Mention

  • Model as bipartite matching or flow problem with costs.
  • Objective: minimize maximum load per center (days = max load).
  • Use min-cost max-flow or binary search + max flow for optimality.
  • Time complexity: O((N+M) * N * M) for flow, or O(log(max_days) * flow).
  • Space complexity: O(N*M) for graph representation.
  • Greedy may fail; need optimal assignment.
  • Edge cases: N=0, M=0, all match, none match.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.