My first instinct was to track the min and max positions of elements seen so far as I iterated k from 1 to N.
For each k, the elements 1..k form a contiguous block iff max(positions[1..k]) - min(positions[1..k]) + 1 == k. Precompute the positions of each value, then iterate k from 1 to N, maintaining the running min and max of positions to check the condition in O(1) per k, yielding an overall O(N) solution.
Pro tip: Mention that this O(N) approach is optimal because you must at least read the input, and explicitly state the invariant: the block is contiguous exactly when the span of positions equals the number of elements. This shows you understand the mathematical insight and can communicate it clearly.
Restate the problem: for each k, check if values 1..k occupy a contiguous subarray. Confirm that the permutation contains each integer exactly once and that N can be large (e.g., up to 10^5 or more), so an O(N^2) solution is too slow.
Create an array pos of size N+1 where pos[v] is the index of value v in the permutation. This allows O(1) lookup of any value's position.
Initialize minPos = N, maxPos = 0. For k from 1 to N, update minPos = min(minPos, pos[k]) and maxPos = max(maxPos, pos[k]). Check if maxPos - minPos + 1 == k; if true, append '1' to the result, else '0'.
After the loop, return the constructed string of length N. Optionally, discuss edge cases like N=1 and verify with a small example.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.