← IMC Interview Insights

IMC·Machine Learning Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

Intermediate
Jun 2026

Summary

IMC ML Engineer interview with a market-making probability puzzle that looked straightforward until the follow-ups hit. The math is clean on paper but the conditional probability extension and the exponential distribution variant both require you to actually know what you're doing, not just memorize a formula.

Questions Asked (3)

Q1

You're a buyer in a market-making scenario. Each item is defective with probability 0.7 (worth 7000 to you) or genuine with probability 0.3 (worth 10000 to you). Defective sellers only sell if you bid at least 3000; genuine sellers only sell if you bid at least 7000. You can't observe the item type before bidding. What single bid maximizes your expected profit?

Pricing & MonetizationTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

The key branch is whether to bid in the 3000-6999 range or go up to 7000+.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

First, identify the possible bid ranges and the types of sellers who would accept each bid. Then compute the expected profit for a representative bid in each range, considering the conditional probability of the item type given that the seller accepts. Finally, compare the expected profits to find the optimal bid.

Pro tip: In market-making interviews, always clarify whether the probabilities are unconditional or conditional on the seller's acceptance. Here, the 0.7 and 0.3 are unconditional, so you must use Bayes' rule to update after observing a sale.

1. Identify bid ranges and seller behavior

Determine the minimum bid required for each seller type to sell: defective sellers accept bids ≥3000, genuine sellers accept bids ≥7000. Thus, bids fall into three ranges: below 3000 (no sale), 3000–6999 (only defective sellers accept), and ≥7000 (both types accept).

2. Compute expected profit for bids in 3000–6999

For a bid b in this range, only defective sellers accept. The item is certainly defective, worth 7000. Expected profit = 7000 - b. This is maximized at the lowest bid, b=3000, giving profit 4000.

3. Compute expected profit for bids ≥7000

For a bid b ≥7000, both seller types accept. Use Bayes' rule to find the probability the item is defective given a sale: P(defective | sale) = 0.7. Expected value = 0.7*7000 + 0.3*10000 = 7900. Expected profit = 7900 - b. This is maximized at the lowest bid, b=7000, giving profit 900.

4. Compare and conclude

Compare the maximum expected profits: 4000 (from bidding 3000) vs. 900 (from bidding 7000). The optimal single bid is 3000, yielding an expected profit of 4000.

Key Points to Mention

  • Adverse selection: bidding higher attracts genuine sellers but also overpaying for defective items.
  • Conditional probability: the probability of item type given that the seller accepts the bid.
  • Expected value calculation: incorporate both the value of the item and the bid price.
  • Threshold analysis: evaluate the optimal bid at the boundaries of seller acceptance ranges.
  • Comparison of expected profits across different bid ranges.
  • The role of the base rates (0.7 defective, 0.3 genuine) in the absence of additional information.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Now suppose you observe a partial signal about the item before bidding. Re-derive the optimal bid using conditional probability based on that signal.

A/B Testing & ExperimentationTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This tripped me up more than I expected.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clearly defining the bidding setting and the signal structure, then apply Bayes' rule to update the prior distribution of the item's value. Recompute the expected value conditional on the signal and derive the optimal bid as the maximum of the posterior expected value minus the bid (or the posterior quantile for a first-price auction).

Pro tip: Explicitly state your assumptions about the signal's informativeness and independence, and discuss how the optimal bid changes with signal precision—this shows you understand the practical implications of partial information.

1. Define the model and signal

Specify the prior distribution of the item's value, the auction type (e.g., first-price, second-price), and the signal's conditional distribution given the value. Clarify whether the signal is discrete or continuous and its relationship to the value.

2. Apply Bayes' rule

Compute the posterior distribution of the value given the observed signal using Bayes' theorem: P(Value | Signal) ∝ P(Signal | Value) * P(Value).

3. Compute the posterior expected value

Calculate the expected value of the item under the posterior distribution, E[Value | Signal]. This is the key quantity for risk-neutral bidding.

4. Derive the optimal bid

For a second-price auction, the optimal bid is the posterior expected value. For a first-price auction, solve for the bid that maximizes expected profit, often involving the posterior distribution's quantiles or solving a differential equation.

5. Interpret and discuss implications

Explain how the optimal bid depends on the signal's precision and the prior. Discuss edge cases (e.g., uninformative signal reduces to prior) and practical considerations like risk aversion or competition.

Key Points to Mention

  • Bayes' rule and conditional probability
  • Prior and posterior distributions
  • Expected value maximization for risk-neutral bidders
  • Difference between first-price and second-price auctions
  • Signal precision and its effect on the optimal bid
  • Independence assumptions between signal and value

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q3

Replace the discrete item values with values drawn from an exponential distribution and redo the expected profit analysis. How does your bidding strategy change?

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

Rough.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

First, clarify the setup: the item values are now drawn from an exponential distribution with a given rate parameter, and the bidding strategy is based on expected profit maximization. Then, derive the new optimal bid by solving the expected profit integral, and compare it to the discrete case, highlighting how the continuous distribution changes the bid shading and risk profile.

Pro tip: Emphasize that the exponential distribution's memorylessness and skewness lead to a constant absolute bid shading (or a proportional bid if values are scaled), which is a key insight for real-time bidding systems. Also, mention that in practice, you'd validate the model with simulation and consider robustness to parameter misestimation.

1. Clarify the problem setup

Restate the assumptions: item values V ~ Exponential(λ), bids are submitted, and the highest bid wins at the second-highest price (or first-price, depending on context). Confirm the objective: maximize expected profit = (V - bid) * P(win).

2. Derive the optimal bid for exponential values

For a first-price auction with one bidder, the optimal bid is the expected value conditional on winning, which for exponential is V - 1/λ (if V is the value). For a second-price auction, the optimal bid is your true value, so no shading. Clarify which auction format applies.

3. Compare with discrete case

In the discrete case, the optimal bid is typically the highest value below your true value (or a shading factor). With exponential, the bid shading becomes a constant absolute amount (1/λ) rather than a percentage, due to the memoryless property.

4. Analyze strategic implications

Discuss how the continuous distribution affects risk: exponential has a long tail, so occasional high values may lead to aggressive bidding. Also, consider how the bid changes with λ: higher λ (lower mean) leads to smaller shading.

5. Validate and extend

Suggest simulation to verify the analytical result, and mention extensions: multiple bidders, unknown λ, or other distributions (e.g., log-normal) for robustness.

Key Points to Mention

  • Exponential distribution properties: memorylessness, mean = 1/λ, variance = 1/λ².
  • Optimal bidding in first-price vs. second-price auctions: shading vs. truthful bidding.
  • Expected profit calculation: integral of (V - bid) * f(V) over the winning region.
  • Comparison of discrete vs. continuous: constant absolute shading vs. percentage shading.
  • Impact of λ on bid: higher λ (lower mean) reduces the optimal bid shading.
  • Practical considerations: parameter estimation, simulation, and robustness to model misspecification.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.