I fumbled the setup a bit because I started talking about user segments before I'd even established what success looks like for a VR creative tool.
Start by clarifying Tiltbrush's strategic goals and target users, then propose a prioritization framework that balances user impact, business value, and technical feasibility. Walk through a concrete example of how you'd apply the framework to a specific feature idea, and end by discussing how you'd measure success and iterate.
Pro tip: Acknowledge Tiltbrush's unique position as a creative tool within Google's ecosystem—prioritize features that drive adoption of VR hardware and cloud services, not just user delight. Show you understand the tension between artistic freedom and platform goals.
Ask about Tiltbrush's current objectives (e.g., user growth, retention, monetization, strategic alignment with Google's VR/AR bets) and any resource constraints. This ensures your prioritization aligns with leadership's expectations.
Define key user personas (e.g., professional artists, hobbyists, educators) and their pain points. Use data and research to understand which features would deliver the most value to each segment.
Use a framework like RICE (Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort) or Value vs. Complexity to score potential features. Consider strategic fit and dependencies (e.g., hardware capabilities).
Propose experiments or MVPs to test high-priority features with users. Define success metrics (e.g., engagement, retention, NPS) and a process for iterating based on feedback.
Explain how you'd socialize the roadmap with stakeholders (engineering, design, marketing, leadership) to build consensus and adjust based on input.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.