← Apple Interview Insights

Apple·Machine Learning Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Senior

SeniorPass
Jul 2026

Summary

Second round ML coding interview at Apple for an MLE role. The whole thing was building out a Transformer from scratch, layering on complexity as you go. Finished well ahead of time and walked away feeling pretty good about it.

Questions Asked (3)

Q1

Implement the internal structure of a Transformer model from scratch.

System DesignTechnical Trade-offsAlgorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

This was the core of the whole session.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by outlining the high-level architecture of a Transformer, then dive into the implementation details of each component, explaining the purpose and design choices. Emphasize modularity, efficiency, and numerical stability, and discuss trade-offs such as layer normalization placement and attention optimizations.

Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness of production constraints by mentioning how you would optimize for Apple's hardware (e.g., using Metal Performance Shaders or Core ML) and ensure the model is efficient for on-device inference.

1. High-Level Architecture Overview

Describe the Transformer's encoder-decoder structure, highlighting self-attention, feed-forward networks, residual connections, and layer normalization. Explain how these components fit together.

2. Implement Multi-Head Self-Attention

Detail the computation of queries, keys, and values, scaled dot-product attention, and concatenation of multiple heads. Discuss masking for autoregressive decoding and efficient matrix operations.

3. Implement Position-wise Feed-Forward Networks

Explain the two linear transformations with a ReLU activation in between, and how they are applied independently to each position. Mention the importance of dimension expansion and contraction.

4. Add Residual Connections and Layer Normalization

Describe how residual connections mitigate vanishing gradients and how layer normalization stabilizes training. Discuss pre-norm vs. post-norm and their trade-offs.

5. Handle Positional Encoding and Masking

Explain the need for positional encodings (sinusoidal or learned) and how to implement them. Discuss masking for padding and causal attention in decoders.

Key Points to Mention

  • Scaled dot-product attention formula and why scaling is necessary
  • Multi-head attention: splitting, parallel computation, and concatenation
  • Positional encoding: sinusoidal vs. learned, and why it's needed
  • Layer normalization: pre-norm vs. post-norm and their impact on training
  • Masking: padding mask and causal mask for autoregressive decoding
  • Efficiency considerations: matrix multiplication optimizations, memory usage, and hardware acceleration

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Extend your Transformer implementation to support multiple attention heads.

Technical Trade-offsAlgorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Came right after the base implementation, no break.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by explaining the motivation for multi-head attention: allowing the model to jointly attend to information from different representation subspaces. Then outline the implementation steps: projecting queries, keys, and values into multiple heads, computing scaled dot-product attention in parallel, concatenating the outputs, and applying a final linear projection. Emphasize the trade-offs in computational efficiency and model capacity.

Pro tip: Mention that you would ensure the head dimension is a divisor of the model dimension to avoid reshaping errors, and that you would use efficient batched matrix operations to leverage hardware parallelism. Also, discuss how you would validate the implementation by checking that the output shape matches the input and that gradients flow correctly.

1. Explain the concept

Briefly describe what multi-head attention is and why it's beneficial: it allows the model to focus on different parts of the sequence simultaneously, capturing diverse relationships.

2. Outline the architecture

Describe how to split the model dimension into multiple heads: project Q, K, V into h heads with dimension d_k = d_model / h, then compute attention independently for each head.

3. Detail the computation

Explain the scaled dot-product attention for each head: softmax(QK^T / sqrt(d_k)) V, then concatenate the outputs and apply a linear transformation.

4. Discuss implementation considerations

Mention efficient tensor operations (e.g., reshaping and transposing for batch matrix multiplication), handling of masks, and ensuring compatibility with existing code.

5. Address trade-offs and validation

Talk about trade-offs: increased model capacity vs. computational cost, and how to validate correctness (e.g., shape checks, gradient checks, and comparing to a single-head baseline).

Key Points to Mention

  • Scaled dot-product attention formula and why scaling is needed
  • Splitting the model dimension into heads and concatenating outputs
  • Efficient batched matrix multiplication using einsum or matmul
  • Handling of attention masks for padded sequences
  • Trade-offs: computational complexity and memory usage
  • Validation: shape consistency, gradient flow, and performance benchmarks

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q3

Add masking to your multi-head attention implementation.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

The final layer of the question.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the type of masking needed (padding vs. causal) and how it integrates into scaled dot-product attention. Then, walk through the implementation step-by-step, explaining how masks are applied before softmax and how to handle broadcasting and numerical stability.

Pro tip: Mention that masks should be applied by adding a large negative value (e.g., -1e9) to the attention scores before softmax, rather than multiplying by zero, to avoid NaNs and ensure proper gradient flow.

1. Clarify mask types and requirements

Ask whether the mask is for padding (ignoring padded tokens) or causal (preventing future token attention), or both. Confirm the expected shape and data type of the mask.

2. Compute attention scores

Calculate the scaled dot-product attention scores: Q @ K^T / sqrt(d_k). Ensure the implementation supports batched inputs and multiple heads.

3. Apply mask to scores

Add a large negative value (e.g., -1e9) to masked positions, or use torch.masked_fill. Ensure the mask broadcasts correctly across batch and head dimensions.

4. Apply softmax and compute weighted sum

Apply softmax along the last dimension to get attention weights, then multiply by V to get the output. Verify that masked positions have near-zero weights.

5. Test and validate

Test with simple cases (e.g., all-ones mask, causal mask) to ensure correctness. Check for numerical stability and gradient flow.

Key Points to Mention

  • Difference between padding mask and causal mask, and how to combine them.
  • Using a large negative value (e.g., -1e9) instead of -inf to avoid NaNs in softmax.
  • Broadcasting mask dimensions to match attention scores shape (batch, heads, seq_len, seq_len).
  • Ensuring masked positions get zero attention weight after softmax.
  • Handling variable sequence lengths and padding in batched inputs.
  • Numerical stability and gradient considerations when using masks.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.