I started with the redirect path because that felt most concrete, then worked backwards to key generation.
Start by clarifying requirements (scale, read/write ratio, latency, custom aliases, expiration) and then walk through the high-level design: API endpoints, key generation, storage, caching, and redirection. Dive into trade-offs for each component, such as key generation strategies, database choices, and caching policies, and finally discuss scaling and reliability.
Pro tip: Emphasize the read-heavy nature of the system and how caching and CDN can drastically reduce latency and load on the database. Also, mention that you would use a 301 redirect for permanent links to enable browser caching, but a 302 for analytics tracking, showing awareness of trade-offs.
Ask about expected traffic (e.g., 100M new URLs per day, 10B redirects per day), read/write ratio, latency requirements, custom aliases, expiration, and analytics. This sets the scope and guides design decisions.
Define endpoints like POST /shorten and GET /{key}. Discuss key generation strategies: base62 encoding of a globally unique ID (e.g., from a distributed counter like Snowflake or a database auto-increment), or hashing with collision resolution. Consider custom aliases.
Select a database (e.g., NoSQL like DynamoDB for scalability, or SQL for strong consistency). Model the mapping: short key -> long URL, with metadata like creation time, expiration, and user ID. Discuss indexing and partitioning.
Use a cache (e.g., Redis or Memcached) to store hot URLs, reducing database load. For redirection, use HTTP 301 (permanent) or 302 (temporary) based on analytics needs. Consider CDN for edge caching.
Scale horizontally with load balancers, shard the database, and use read replicas. Ensure high availability with replication and failover. Discuss rate limiting, analytics, and cleanup of expired URLs.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.