← Google Interview Insights

Google·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
Apr 2026Remote

Summary

Google SWE coding round, got a prefix sum problem with a streaming follow-up that I did not fully see coming. The core problem was manageable but the follow-up is where things got interesting.

Questions Asked (2)

Q1

Given an integer array and a target value k, count the number of contiguous subarrays whose elements sum to exactly k.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

I knew the prefix sum trick going in, so the O(n) hashmap solution came out pretty clean.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the problem constraints (e.g., array size, element ranges, whether negative numbers are allowed) and then propose an optimal solution using a hash map to store prefix sums. Explain that for each index, you check if the current prefix sum minus k exists in the map, which indicates a subarray summing to k. This yields O(n) time and O(n) space.

Pro tip: Mention that this problem is a variation of the classic 'Two Sum' and that the prefix sum technique is a common pattern for subarray sum problems. Also, be prepared to discuss how the solution changes if the array contains only positive numbers (sliding window) versus negative numbers (hash map).

1. Clarify constraints and edge cases

Ask about array size, element ranges, and whether negative numbers are allowed. Discuss edge cases like empty array, k=0, and large inputs.

2. Explain brute force and its limitations

Describe the O(n^2) approach of checking all subarrays and note that it's inefficient for large inputs, setting the stage for optimization.

3. Introduce prefix sum and hash map

Define prefix sum and explain how storing counts of prefix sums in a hash map allows O(1) lookup for the required complement (current prefix sum - k).

4. Walk through the algorithm with an example

Trace the algorithm on a small example to demonstrate correctness, showing how the count is updated and how the hash map is maintained.

5. Analyze complexity and discuss alternatives

State time and space complexity (O(n) each) and mention that if all numbers are positive, a sliding window approach can achieve O(n) time and O(1) space.

Key Points to Mention

  • Prefix sum concept and its role in subarray sum problems
  • Hash map to store frequency of prefix sums for O(1) lookups
  • Handling negative numbers and zeros (hash map works, sliding window does not)
  • Time and space complexity analysis (O(n) time, O(n) space)
  • Edge cases: empty array, k=0, large input sizes
  • Comparison with sliding window approach for positive-only arrays

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

How would you adapt your solution if the array elements arrive one at a time as a stream, and you need to report the updated count after each new element?

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This is where I stumbled a bit.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

First, clarify the problem: what exactly needs to be counted (e.g., distinct elements, frequency of a specific value, or something else) and whether the stream is unbounded. Then, propose a data structure that supports efficient updates and queries, such as a hash map for frequency counts, and discuss time/space trade-offs. Finally, walk through an example to demonstrate how the count is updated after each element.

Pro tip: Emphasize that you would confirm the definition of 'count' and the constraints (e.g., memory limits, latency requirements) before choosing a data structure, as this shows you think about real-world system design, not just algorithms.

1. Clarify the problem

Ask what exactly needs to be counted (e.g., distinct elements, occurrences of a target, or frequency distribution) and whether the stream is infinite or bounded. Also check if there are constraints on memory or update latency.

2. Choose a data structure

Select an appropriate data structure based on the clarified requirements. For example, a hash map for frequency counts, a set for distinct elements, or a balanced BST for order statistics. Explain why it supports O(1) or O(log n) updates.

3. Define the update and query operations

Describe how each new element updates the data structure and how the current count is retrieved. For instance, increment the frequency in a hash map and return the size or the specific count.

4. Analyze trade-offs

Discuss time and space complexity, and any trade-offs (e.g., exact vs. approximate counting, memory usage). Mention alternatives like Bloom filters or Count-Min Sketch if approximate answers are acceptable.

5. Walk through an example

Trace the algorithm with a small stream of elements to show how the count updates after each arrival, ensuring clarity and correctness.

Key Points to Mention

  • Hash map for frequency counting with O(1) average update time
  • Handling of duplicates and distinct element counting
  • Space complexity and potential memory issues with unbounded streams
  • Approximate counting techniques (e.g., Count-Min Sketch) for large-scale streams
  • Real-time reporting requirement and latency considerations
  • Edge cases: empty stream, single element, all duplicates

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.