← Bloomberg Interview Insights
I got the basic logic pretty fast: parse each record, flag anything over 1000, then check for same-name transactions within 60 minutes in a different city.
Clarify the input format and constraints, then design an algorithm that parses each transaction and checks both invalidity conditions. For the time-window condition, group transactions by person and compare each transaction with others within 60 minutes, using a sliding window or hash map to optimize. Finally, collect and return all invalid transactions, ensuring no duplicates.
Pro tip: Mention that since the list is time-sorted, you can use a sliding window per person to avoid O(n^2) comparisons, and discuss the trade-off between time and space complexity.
Ask clarifying questions about input format, time units, and output order. Parse each transaction string into name, time, amount, and city.
Immediately mark any transaction with amount > 1000 as invalid.
Group transactions by person. For each person, use a sliding window (since list is time-sorted) to compare transactions within 60 minutes and flag those with different cities.
Collect all invalid transactions, ensuring each transaction is added only once even if it violates both conditions.
Discuss time and space complexity of your approach, and consider alternative strategies like hash maps for unsorted input.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.