The green pass first, then yellows thing is the key insight and I actually got there pretty fast.
Start by clarifying the problem and edge cases, then propose a two-pass algorithm: first mark greens and count remaining target letters, then mark yellows using the counts while ensuring each target letter is used once. Discuss time and space complexity, and consider optimizations like early termination or using a fixed-size array for counts.
Pro tip: Mention that you can avoid a second pass by using a frequency map and processing yellows in the same pass, but be careful to not double-count letters already matched as green. Also, highlight that the order of marking yellows doesn't matter as long as you respect the counts.
Confirm that guess and target are equal length, discuss handling of repeated letters, and ask about case sensitivity or non-alphabetic characters if relevant.
Propose a two-pass approach: first pass marks greens and builds a frequency count of unmatched target letters; second pass marks yellows by checking the count and decrementing it.
Use an array or hash map to track remaining counts, ensuring each target letter is claimed at most once. Mark greens first to avoid misclassifying repeated letters.
State that time complexity is O(n) and space O(1) for fixed alphabet. Walk through examples with repeated letters to verify correctness.
Mention possible optimizations like using a single pass with careful ordering, or using bitmasks for small alphabets, and discuss trade-offs.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
First, clarify the data structures and the exact condition for marking a letter as absent. Then, outline the modifications to the evaluator: maintain a set of absent letters, update it after each round based on the guess and feedback, and validate future guesses against this set. Finally, discuss any trade-offs or edge cases.
Pro tip: Emphasize that the absent set should only be updated when a letter is not present in the target at all, which is inferred when all occurrences of that letter in the guess are marked 'W'. This prevents false positives when a letter is present but misplaced.
Confirm the feedback symbols (e.g., 'W' for wrong/absent, 'C' for correct, 'P' for present but wrong position) and the rule for confirming absence. Ask if the target is fixed or if multiple rounds are independent.
Propose maintaining a set (or hash set) of absent letters. Also, consider how to track letter occurrences in the guess and feedback to determine absence correctly.
After each round, iterate through the guess and feedback. For each letter, if all its occurrences in the guess are marked 'W', add it to the absent set. Then, before evaluating a new guess, check if any letter is in the absent set; if so, flag the guess as invalid.
Discuss cases like repeated letters, letters that are absent but not all occurrences marked 'W' (should not be added), and performance implications of set lookups. Consider if the absent set should persist across games or reset.
Walk through an example to demonstrate correctness, and mention potential unit tests for the new functionality.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.