← Expedia Interview Insights

Expedia·Software Engineer·Onsite - Behavioral / Leadership·Intermediate

Intermediate
Apr 2026

Summary

Behavioral round at Expedia for a software engineer role. Two questions, both pretty standard but the second one had some meat to it if you came prepared with a real story.

Questions Asked (2)

Q1

Walk me through how you pick up new technologies or knowledge quickly. Give a specific example.

Adaptability & Ambiguity
Author's notes

I had a decent example ready but I rambled a bit trying to make it sound more impressive than it was.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Use a structured story like STAR to describe a specific instance where you rapidly learned a new technology, emphasizing your learning process and the measurable outcome. Highlight how you broke down the learning, leveraged resources, and applied it to deliver results, tying it back to the role at Expedia.

Pro tip: Show that you not only learned the technology but also evaluated its trade-offs and integrated it into the existing system, demonstrating engineering judgment beyond just picking up syntax.

1. Set the Context

Briefly describe the project, the unfamiliar technology, and why it was needed, including any constraints like tight deadlines or ambiguity.

2. Outline Your Learning Strategy

Explain how you approached learning: e.g., official docs, tutorials, building a small prototype, or consulting experts, and how you prioritized what to learn first.

3. Describe Application and Challenges

Detail how you applied the new knowledge to the project, including obstacles you overcame and how you validated your understanding.

4. Share the Outcome

Quantify the result: e.g., feature delivered on time, performance improved, or team adopted your approach, and mention any lessons learned.

5. Connect to Expedia

Relate the experience to Expedia's engineering culture, such as handling ambiguity, moving fast, or collaborating across teams.

Key Points to Mention

  • A specific technology you learned (e.g., a framework, language, or tool) and the business context.
  • Your learning methodology: how you identified key concepts, used resources, and practiced.
  • How you validated your learning (e.g., code reviews, tests, prototypes).
  • Challenges faced and how you adapted your approach.
  • Measurable outcomes (e.g., time saved, performance gains, project impact).
  • Relevance to Expedia: e.g., adaptability in a fast-paced environment, learning from failures, or knowledge sharing.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Tell me about the most challenging project you've worked on. What was your role, what constraints did you face, and what was the outcome? Also, how did you measure success and what would you do differently?

Adaptability & AmbiguityTechnical Trade-offsCross-functional Alignment
Author's notes

This one is deceptively layered.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Choose a project that genuinely challenged you and aligns with Expedia's focus on adaptability, technical trade-offs, and cross-functional alignment. Structure your answer using a narrative arc: set the context, describe your specific role, the constraints, the actions you took, and the measurable outcome. End with honest reflection on what you'd do differently and how you measured success.

Pro tip: Quantify the impact and constraints wherever possible (e.g., 'reduced latency by 40% under a 2-week deadline with a team of 3') to make your story credible and memorable. Also, tie your 'what I'd do differently' to a concrete lesson that shows growth, not regret.

1. Set the Context

Briefly describe the project, its goals, and why it was challenging. Mention the team size, timeline, and any high-level constraints to orient the interviewer.

2. Clarify Your Role

Explicitly state your specific responsibilities and contributions. Avoid vague 'we' statements; use 'I' to highlight your individual impact.

3. Detail Constraints and Actions

Explain the key constraints (technical, time, resources, cross-functional dependencies) and the concrete steps you took to overcome them. Highlight trade-offs you made and why.

4. Share Measurable Outcomes

Describe the results using metrics (e.g., performance improvements, cost savings, user adoption). Explain how you measured success and what the final impact was.

5. Reflect and Iterate

Discuss what you would do differently and why. Focus on lessons learned and how you've applied them to subsequent projects.

Key Points to Mention

  • Specific technical trade-offs (e.g., choosing scalability over speed, or vice versa) and the rationale behind them
  • Cross-functional collaboration: how you aligned with product, design, or other teams to overcome ambiguity
  • Quantifiable metrics for success (e.g., reduced latency by X%, increased conversion by Y%, saved Z engineering hours)
  • Constraints faced: tight deadlines, limited resources, legacy systems, or shifting requirements
  • Your individual contribution and leadership within the team
  • A concrete lesson learned and how you applied it to future projects

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.