Start by outlining multiple methods to transform uniform random variables into normal samples, such as inverse transform, Box-Muller, and Ziggurat. Compare their trade-offs in terms of computational efficiency, accuracy, and implementation complexity. Then, implement one method (e.g., Box-Muller) with clear, efficient code, explaining each step.
Pro tip: Mention that while inverse transform is conceptually simple, it requires the inverse CDF, which is computationally expensive; Box-Muller is a good balance for interviews, but for high-performance applications like trading systems, the Ziggurat algorithm is preferred due to its speed.
Ask about performance needs, accuracy, and whether the normal generator will be used in a latency-sensitive context. This shows you consider practical trade-offs.
Describe inverse transform, Box-Muller, and Ziggurat (or Marsaglia polar) methods. Briefly explain how each works and their pros/cons.
Discuss computational complexity, memory usage, and ease of implementation. For example, inverse transform is O(1) but slow due to erfinv; Box-Muller is O(1) and fast but uses trig functions; Ziggurat is fastest but complex.
Choose Box-Muller for its balance of simplicity and efficiency. Implement it in code, explaining the transformation and how to handle the two independent normals.
Mention how you would verify the output: check mean, variance, and perhaps run a normality test like Kolmogorov-Smirnov. This shows attention to correctness.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.