The row/column swaps and reversals were fine, pretty mechanical.
Clarify the command semantics and matrix dimensions, then choose a representation that makes each operation efficient. Implement each command with careful index mapping, especially for rotation, and test with non-square matrices to ensure correctness.
Pro tip: For rotation, avoid creating a new matrix by using in-place techniques or index mapping; but if simplicity is preferred, a new matrix is acceptable—just discuss the trade-off. Also, consider pre-processing commands to combine consecutive operations for efficiency.
Ask about command semantics (e.g., rotation direction, swap indices 0-based or 1-based), matrix dimensions, and whether commands can be chained. Confirm if in-place modification is required or if a new matrix is acceptable.
Decide whether to store the matrix as a list of lists or a flat array. For each command, determine the most efficient approach: rotation may require transposition and reversal, swaps are straightforward, reversals can be done in-place.
Write helper functions for each command. For rotation, map (i, j) to (j, m-1-i) for clockwise. For swaps, swap rows or columns. For reversals, reverse rows or columns in-place.
Test with 1xN, Nx1, and rectangular matrices. Verify that rotation changes dimensions correctly. Check boundary conditions for swaps and reversals.
Discuss the complexity of each operation: rotation O(m*n), swaps O(n) or O(m), reversals O(n) or O(m). Mention trade-offs between in-place and new matrix approaches.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.