This was a single question that ran the entire interview.
Structure your answer as a layered system design: start with the recruiter-facing UI and end-to-end flow, then dive into the AI pipeline (context retrieval, prompt construction, LLM serving, personalization signals), and finally address cross-cutting concerns like latency, cost, abuse prevention, and PII. Emphasize trade-offs and how you would measure success at each stage, showing both technical depth and product sense.
Pro tip: Anchor your design around LinkedIn's unique data assets (rich member profiles, job postings, and interaction history) and propose a feedback loop that uses recruiter edits and candidate responses as implicit labels for continuous fine-tuning. This demonstrates you understand how to leverage proprietary data for competitive advantage.
Ask clarifying questions to understand the recruiter workflow, success metrics (e.g., response rate, time saved), and constraints (latency, cost, privacy). Define the end-to-end flow from candidate selection to message tracking.
Outline the UI for selecting candidates, previewing personalized messages, and editing. Describe how to retrieve candidate and job context from LinkedIn's profile, activity, and job databases, including real-time signals.
Explain how to construct prompts using retrieved context and personalization signals (e.g., shared connections, skills, recent activity). Discuss LLM serving options (fine-tuned vs. API-based), latency optimization, and cost control.
Describe the sending pipeline (e.g., InMail delivery, rate limiting) and tracking (opens, replies). Design a feedback loop where recruiter edits and candidate responses are used to improve the model via fine-tuning or reinforcement learning.
Discuss strategies to meet latency SLAs (caching, async generation), cost optimization (model distillation, batching), abuse prevention (spam detection, rate limits), and PII handling (anonymization, access controls).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.