← Squarepoint Interview Insights
Expected something more finance-flavored given how the question was framed beforehand, so the NA handling opener felt weirdly basic.
Start by clarifying the data's structure and the purpose of the analysis, then systematically classify missingness by field and pattern. Propose tailored imputation or exclusion strategies for each field, emphasizing validation and documentation of assumptions.
Pro tip: Highlight that missing timestamps or customer IDs often indicate data pipeline issues, so fixing the source is better than imputing. For merchant, consider that missingness may be informative (e.g., declined transactions) and could be encoded as a separate category.
Ask about the data source, volume, and intended use (e.g., fraud detection, customer profiling). Confirm whether missingness is random or systematic.
Compute missing rates per field and analyze patterns (e.g., missing timestamps correlated with certain customers). Determine if missingness is MCAR, MAR, or MNAR.
If timestamps are missing, consider dropping records or imputing based on sequence if time order is known. For critical analysis, flag and exclude.
If customer ID is missing, assess if it can be inferred from other records (e.g., same timestamp and merchant). Otherwise, treat as a separate 'unknown' category or exclude.
Impute using mode or a model based on customer history, or create an 'unknown' category. Consider if missingness itself is predictive.
Test the impact of imputation on downstream metrics. Document all decisions and assumptions for reproducibility.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.