I thought the aggregation part would be the hard bit but it was the parsing that ate my time.
Start by clarifying requirements and edge cases, then outline a modular design with separate parsing, normalization, and aggregation components. Emphasize extensibility for grouping strategies and discuss trade-offs between performance, memory, and code complexity. Walk through a concrete example and mention testing and error handling.
Pro tip: Demonstrate production readiness by discussing how you would handle large files with streaming and how you would make the grouping strategy pluggable via a simple interface or function pointer, showing you think about maintainability and scalability.
Ask about input size, expected malformed lines, timestamp formats, and whether aggregation should be streaming or batch. Confirm the need for pluggable grouping strategies.
Outline a parser that reads line-by-line, tokenizes on whitespace or commas, validates token count, and handles errors. Separate normalization (e.g., datetime to UTC) and aggregation into distinct modules.
Use a dictionary to count by status, but design the aggregator to accept a grouping function (e.g., key extractor) so other groupings (by user, action) can be swapped in easily.
Compare streaming vs. loading all lines, memory usage, and speed. Mention using generators, efficient string splitting, and possibly parallel processing for large files.
Describe unit tests for malformed lines, different delimiters, timestamp normalization, and aggregation correctness. Mention logging and metrics for production monitoring.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.