The SQL part tripped me up more than I expected.
Start by writing SQL queries to explore the data: check for duplicate (subscription_id, status_date) pairs, examine the distribution of statuses, and identify all observed status transitions. Then, in pandas, filter for ACTIVE and INACTIVE rows, group by subscription_id, and compute the minimum date for ACTIVE and maximum date for INACTIVE, handling cases where a subscription may lack one of the statuses.
Pro tip: When investigating status transitions, consider the order of events per subscription and look for unexpected transitions (e.g., ACTIVE to ACTIVE without an INACTIVE in between) to uncover data quality issues. Also, clarify with the interviewer whether 'first date ACTIVE' and 'last date INACTIVE' should be based on the entire history or only after the most recent status change.
Write queries to check uniqueness of (subscription_id, status_date), count distinct statuses, and list all distinct status transitions by ordering events per subscription.
Identify which transitions are present (e.g., ACTIVE->INACTIVE, INACTIVE->ACTIVE) and flag any anomalies like missing intermediate states or duplicate dates.
Read the data into a DataFrame, convert status_date to datetime, and sort by subscription_id and status_date to ensure chronological order.
Group by subscription_id and aggregate: for ACTIVE rows, take the minimum status_date; for INACTIVE rows, take the maximum status_date. Merge these results into a single DataFrame.
If a subscription has no ACTIVE or no INACTIVE records, decide whether to include with NaN or exclude, and ensure the final DataFrame has columns subscription_id, first_active_date, last_inactive_date.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.