My first instinct was to check every pair of points, which is obviously too slow but I coded it halfway anyway before catching myself.
Model the points as nodes in a graph where edges connect points sharing a row or column with distance < d, then count connected components using Union-Find (DSU). To avoid O(n^2) pairwise checks, group points by row and by column, sort each group by coordinate, and union adjacent points within distance d.
Pro tip: Mention that the distance condition is 1D within a row or column, so sorting each group and checking adjacent points suffices; this reduces the time complexity to O(n log n) and shows you optimize beyond the naive approach.
Confirm the definition of 'directly connected' (same row or column, distance < d) and that connectivity is transitive. Ask about input size, coordinate ranges, and whether d is inclusive or exclusive.
Treat each point as a node. Add an edge between two points if they share a row or column and their 1D distance is strictly less than d. The answer is the number of connected components in this graph.
Group points by row and by column. For each group, sort points by the relevant coordinate (x for rows, y for columns). Then, only union adjacent points in the sorted order if their distance < d, since any farther pair would be connected via the chain of closer points.
Initialize a DSU with n components. For each valid adjacent pair, perform a union operation. After processing all groups, the number of distinct roots in the DSU is the number of connected components.
Time: O(n log n) due to sorting; space: O(n) for DSU and grouping. Discuss potential edge cases like duplicate points, empty input, or large d.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.