← Hudson River Trading Interview Insights
My first instinct was to just check each length-3 window and see if any character is a vowel.
Clarify the problem constraints (e.g., string length, character set) and edge cases, then propose an efficient sliding window solution that checks each length-3 window for vowels in O(n) time. Discuss trade-offs between brute force and optimized approaches, and write clean code with clear variable names.
Pro tip: At Hudson River Trading, interviewers value clean, efficient code and the ability to discuss time/space complexity upfront. Mention that you'd handle edge cases like strings shorter than 3 characters and consider Unicode if relevant, but stick to ASCII for simplicity unless specified.
Ask about input size, character set (ASCII vs Unicode), and whether overlapping substrings count. Confirm that 'at least one vowel' includes both lowercase and uppercase.
Propose a sliding window of size 3 to scan the string once, maintaining a count of vowels in the current window. State that this yields O(n) time and O(1) space.
Trace the algorithm on a small example like 'abcde' to demonstrate correctness and edge cases (e.g., no vowels, all vowels).
Write code with a helper function to check if a character is a vowel. Use a loop to slide the window, updating the vowel count and incrementing the result when count > 0.
Test with strings of length < 3, strings with no vowels, and strings with all vowels. Mention potential optimizations or alternative approaches if asked.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.