I went with a min-heap of size k, which gets you O(n log k) and I felt pretty good about that.
Start by clarifying the problem constraints and edge cases, then propose an efficient solution using a min-heap of size k or Quickselect. Walk through the algorithm step-by-step, analyze time and space complexity, and provide test cases including duplicates, negatives, and k out of bounds.
Pro tip: Mention that Quickselect has average O(n) but worst-case O(n^2), and you can use a randomized pivot or Median of Medians to guarantee O(n). Also, discuss the trade-offs between heap and Quickselect based on k and memory constraints.
Ask about input size, value range, whether k is 1-indexed, and how to handle k > array length. Confirm expected output for invalid k (e.g., return null or throw exception).
Decide between sorting, min-heap, or Quickselect. For large n and small k, min-heap is efficient; for average O(n), Quickselect is preferred. Explain your choice based on constraints.
Describe step-by-step how the chosen method works. For min-heap: build heap of first k elements, then for each remaining element, if larger than heap root, replace and heapify. For Quickselect: partition around a pivot, recurse on the side containing the kth largest.
State time and space complexity. For min-heap: O(n log k) time, O(k) space. For Quickselect: average O(n), worst O(n^2), O(1) space if iterative. Mention randomization to avoid worst-case.
Give at least three test cases: (1) array with duplicates and negatives, (2) k = 1 (largest), (3) k = array length (smallest), (4) k > length (invalid). For each, state expected output and why.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.