← Homedepot Interview Insights
The bug is that the WHERE clause filters on p.discount_pct > 0, which kills the LEFT JOIN.
Start by systematically checking each join condition and filter for potential row-dropping issues, such as inner joins excluding unmatched rows, overly restrictive date filters, or mismatched keys. Then, validate data quality and cardinality assumptions, and consider using outer joins or pre-aggregation to diagnose the root cause.
Pro tip: Always verify join keys and data types first—mismatched types or NULLs in join columns are common culprits that silently drop rows. Also, check if the date filter is applied to the correct table and time zone.
Check if inner joins are used where outer joins might be needed, and ensure join keys are correctly matched. Look for implicit filtering due to join conditions.
Ensure the date filter is applied to the correct date column (e.g., sales date vs. promotion date) and that the time zone and format are consistent. Verify that the last 30 days are correctly calculated.
Look for NULLs, duplicates, or mismatched data types in join keys. Also, check if promotions or products are missing for mulch sales, causing inner joins to drop rows.
Ensure that joins are at the correct level of granularity (e.g., sale item vs. product) and that aggregations are not causing unexpected row loss. Consider if the join is inadvertently creating a many-to-many relationship that filters rows.
Use LEFT JOINs to identify which table is causing the row loss. Run subqueries to count rows at each stage and compare with the final result to pinpoint the root cause.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
I talked through running incremental counts: start with just the sales table filtered to the date range, then join sale_items and count, then bring in products with the category filter and count again, then add the LEFT JOIN on promotions.
Start by isolating the query into its component joins and filters, then systematically test each one to identify where rows are lost. Use a process of elimination, comparing row counts at each stage and validating join keys and filter conditions.
Pro tip: Always check for implicit filtering caused by inner joins on nullable columns or mismatched data types—these are common culprits that silently drop rows. Also, consider using LEFT JOINs temporarily to see which rows are excluded.
Clarify the expected row count and which tables/columns are involved. Identify the grain of the final result and the intended join logic.
Decompose the query into individual joins and filters. Run each join step-by-step, comparing row counts to the previous step to spot where rows are lost.
Check join keys for data type mismatches, NULL values, or duplicate keys. Use LEFT JOIN to see which rows from the left table are not matching.
Review WHERE and HAVING clauses for overly restrictive conditions. Test filters individually and consider NULL handling (e.g., NULL comparisons).
Select specific rows that should be included and trace them through the query to see where they get dropped. Use temporary tables or CTEs to isolate steps.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
Moved the p.discount_pct > 0 condition into the JOIN's ON clause so the LEFT JOIN actually behaves like a left join.
First, identify the bugs in the original query, such as incorrect joins, missing date filtering, or improper aggregation. Then, rewrite the query using a date spine or calendar table to ensure all days in the last 30 days are included, and use conditional aggregation to separate promo and non-promo units. Finally, validate the results by checking edge cases like days with no promotions.
Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness of data completeness by explicitly handling days with no promotions, and mention the importance of using a date dimension table to avoid missing dates. This shows you think about production-grade solutions.
Review the original query to pinpoint issues such as incorrect join conditions, missing date filters, or improper grouping that lead to incorrect results.
Use a calendar table or a recursive CTE to generate all dates in the last 30 days, ensuring no days are omitted even if there is no data.
Join the date range with sales data and use conditional aggregation (e.g., CASE WHEN) to calculate total mulch units, total revenue, and promo units separately.
Ensure that days with no active promotion still appear with zero promo units by using LEFT JOINs and COALESCE or IFNULL to replace nulls with zeros.
Check the output for correctness, especially edge cases, and consider indexing or query performance improvements if needed.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.