← Meta Interview Insights

Meta·Machine Learning Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Senior

SeniorPrefer not to say
Jun 2026

Summary

Meta ML engineer interview with two coding questions, both algorithmic but with a design flavor. The weighted sampling one was trickier than it looked and the sparse vector follow-up caught me a bit flat-footed.

Questions Asked (2)

Q1

Given a map of city names to their populations, implement a class that preprocesses the data and then lets you call a method repeatedly to randomly return a city, where the probability of picking a city is proportional to its population.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

The core idea isn't hard: build a prefix sum array over sorted cities, generate a random number in [0, total_population), binary search for it.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Clarify the problem requirements, then design a solution using prefix sums and binary search for efficient O(log n) sampling. Implement the class with a preprocessing step that builds the prefix sum array and a sampling method that generates a random number and finds the corresponding city. Discuss trade-offs and potential optimizations.

Pro tip: Mention that using binary search on prefix sums is optimal for repeated queries, and consider edge cases like zero population or empty map. Also, note that if the distribution is static, this approach is ideal; for dynamic updates, a Fenwick tree could be used.

1. Clarify Requirements

Ask about input constraints, expected query frequency, and whether the population data can change. Confirm that probabilities should be proportional to population and that the method will be called many times.

2. Design Data Structures

Choose to store city names in an array and compute a prefix sum array of populations. This allows mapping a random number to a city via binary search.

3. Implement Preprocessing

In the constructor, iterate through the map, store city names and populations, and build the prefix sum array. Handle edge cases like empty map or zero total population.

4. Implement Sampling Method

Generate a random integer between 1 and total population (inclusive). Use binary search on the prefix sum array to find the index where the cumulative sum is >= the random number, then return the corresponding city.

5. Analyze and Optimize

Discuss time and space complexity: O(n) preprocessing, O(log n) per query, O(n) space. Mention potential optimizations like using a Fenwick tree for dynamic updates or alternative sampling methods.

Key Points to Mention

  • Prefix sum array construction and its role in enabling efficient sampling.
  • Binary search to map a random number to a city in O(log n) time.
  • Handling edge cases: empty map, zero populations, and ensuring probabilities sum to 1.
  • Time and space complexity analysis: O(n) preprocessing, O(log n) per query, O(n) space.
  • Trade-offs: static vs dynamic data, and when to use alternative structures like Fenwick trees.
  • Random number generation details: using a uniform distribution over [1, total population] and inclusive bounds.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Compute the dot product of two sparse vectors, where each vector is given as a list of (index, value) pairs and the dimension can be enormous. Then, as a follow-up: if you're computing many dot products and only a few entries change between calls, how would you avoid recomputing from scratch each time?

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offsSystem Design
Author's notes

Two-pointer merge on sorted index lists for the base case, pretty standard.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the sparse vector representation and constraints, then propose a two-pointer merge algorithm for the dot product. For the follow-up, discuss incremental computation using a hash map to track contributions and update only changed entries, while considering trade-offs like memory overhead and update frequency.

Pro tip: Emphasize that the optimal approach depends on the sparsity pattern and update frequency; showing awareness of these trade-offs demonstrates engineering maturity. Also, mention that in ML, sparse dot products are common in embedding lookups and feature interactions, so optimizing them can have real impact.

1. Clarify the problem

Confirm the input format: each vector is a list of (index, value) pairs, indices are sorted, and dimension is huge but sparse. Ask about value types (e.g., floats) and if indices are unique.

2. Design the basic algorithm

Use two pointers to traverse both lists simultaneously, advancing the pointer with the smaller index. When indices match, multiply values and add to the result. This runs in O(nnz1 + nnz2) time and O(1) extra space.

3. Analyze complexity and edge cases

Discuss time and space complexity, and handle edge cases like empty vectors, no overlapping indices, and duplicate indices (if not guaranteed unique).

4. Address the follow-up: incremental updates

Propose maintaining a hash map from index to the product of values for overlapping indices, and a running sum. When an entry changes, update the map and adjust the sum by the difference. This gives O(1) update time per changed entry, assuming the map is kept in sync.

5. Discuss trade-offs and alternatives

Compare the incremental approach with recomputation: incremental is faster for few changes but uses extra memory and requires tracking changes. Also mention potential optimizations like using a balanced BST if indices are dynamic, or batching updates.

Key Points to Mention

  • Two-pointer merge algorithm for sparse dot product
  • Time complexity O(nnz1 + nnz2) and space O(1) for basic approach
  • Incremental computation using a hash map to store per-index contributions
  • Trade-offs: memory overhead vs. speed, update frequency, and consistency
  • Handling edge cases: empty vectors, no overlap, duplicate indices
  • Real-world relevance in ML: embedding lookups, feature hashing, and large-scale recommendation systems

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.